Seven men who sought to have a judge overturn their convictions for 
the high-profile 1984 murder of a Northeast D.C. woman failed to prove 
their innocence during a series of hearings that reexamined the case 
earlier this year, a judge ruled Monday.
The ruling by D.C. Superior Court Judge Frederick H. Weisberg 
means that six of the men — Kelvin Smith, Levy Rouse, Clifton 
Yarborough, Timothy Catlett, Russell Overton and Charles Turner — will 
serve out their sentences from their 1985 convictions on charges of 
felony murder in the beating death of Catherine Fuller. A seventh man 
already has been released from prison.
The ruling formally ends a process that began in the spring. During 
three weeks of hearings in April, prosecutors squared off against 
defense attorneys, who argued that authorities, pressured by city 
residents and elected officials, rushed their investigation and arrested
 the wrong men; purposely withheld important evidence that hurt the 
defendants’ case; and threatened witnesses into lying. Prosecutors 
maintained that the seven men were responsible for the killing.
Weisberg ruled that the defense attorneys had failed to produce evidence that their clients were innocent.
“After
 considering all of the evidence, both at trial and at the hearings, the
 court concludes that petitioners have not come close to demonstrating 
actual innocence,” Weisberg wrote in his ruling.
Attorneys for the seven men said they plan to appeal.
“We
 are disappointed that the fight to clear the names of these defendants 
will have to continue, but we continue to believe that there is 
overwhelming evidence that Catherine Fuller was not murdered by these 
defendants,” Barry J. Pollack, one of the lead attorneys for the men, 
said in an interview Monday.
In 1985, a jury found eight 
neighborhood friends — then between 16 and 21  years old —  guilty of 
first-degree murder in connection with Fuller’s death. The men were 
sentenced to 35 years to life in prison. One of them, Steven L. Webb, 
died in prison after a brief illness. Another, Charles Turner’s brother 
Christopher, was paroled in 2010 after more than 25 years behind bars.
Prosecutors
 outlined a horrific scenario during the 1985 trial: Fuller, 48, a 
cleaning woman, wife and mother of six, left her K Street NE home on a 
rainy afternoon to fill a prescription. The suspects were smoking 
marijuana and listening to go-go music at a nearby park.
A group 
of about 30 people confronted Fuller, prosecutors said. She was grabbed 
from behind and pushed into an alley, where she was beaten; a 
12-inch-long metal pole was shoved into her rectum. Her liver was 
shattered, a lung was punctured and four of her ribs were broken, 
according to authorities. Her body was found in a garage in the same 
alley that evening.
In all, 17 people were charged in the murder. 
Five indictments were dismissed, two defendants pleaded guilty to 
second-degree murder and two others were acquitted.
During the 
April hearings, defense attorneys presented four witnesses who told 
Weisberg that detectives had forced them to lie about seeing the men in 
the alley when Fuller was killed. In his ruling, Weisberg said there was
 no evidence that the witnesses made up their accounts and called the 
recantations “incredible.”
Weisberg also highlighted the failed testimony of Melvin Montgomery.
 Defense attorneys had expected Montgomery, 45, to testify that he had 
been pressured into lying when he said he saw the men in the alley at 
the time Fuller was killed.
Instead, in a surprise turn that sent 
defense attorneys scrambling, Montgomery took the stand and told 
Weisberg that he had been truthful during his 1985 testimony.
Weisberg
 called Montgomery’s testimony a “bad turn of events. Whatever else can 
be said of Mr. Montgomery’s ‘recantation,’ it certainly cannot be said 
that his testimony helps petitioners to meet their burden of proving 
actual innocence,” the judge wrote.
In the hearings, defense 
attorneys also argued that prosecutors during the trial had withheld key
 evidence, including information about other possible suspects. For 
example, several witnesses told authorities they had seen another man, 
James McMillan, in the alley at the time of the attack. McMillan, 46, 
whose house was located on the alley where Fuller was killed, is serving
 a life sentence in a Virginia prison for a deadly attack on another 
woman.
Weisberg agreed that prosecutors should have disclosed the 
information about other possible suspects, but ruled that even if 
McMillan had been in the alley, it did not mean the other men were not 
there. McMillan, Weisberg said, “could have been a participant” in the 
attack.
After a 2001 Washington Post article, attorneys from the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project and nearly a dozen volunteers began petitioning for a new trial.
Weisberg
 had ordered a retrial in another case in 2009, ruling that a prosecutor
 deliberately withheld information in a murder trial. On Monday, he 
declined to do the same for the seven men convicted in the Fuller 
killing.
“Unquestionably, they have not proved by clear and 
convincing evidence that they are actually innocent, and just as surely 
they have not established their innocence by a preponderance of the 
evidence,” Weisberg wrote.
No comments:
Post a Comment